Nova PhDs

A forum for grads of Villanova's Philosophy PhD program

journal question
i have a query for some of you who know more about journals in philosophy and religious studies than i do. i have a paper (on the theme of hoping against hope in a literary work) that i'm writing that would, from what I can tell, be appropriate to any of the following journals, but i don't really have a sense of which one is more prestigious, etc. i believe all 4 of them are peer-reviewed and internationally circulating. so, anybody have any advice on these? the journals are

Philosophy and Literature
Religion and Literature
Literature and Theology
Religion and the Arts


if there are any good journals in philosophy/religious studies and literature other than these, that would be good to know as well. thanks in advance for the help!
See you at the APA?
If anyone out there is going to be at the APA this week, you might consider dropping by my paper on the 29th. I am speaking in a panel titled "History and Metaphysics," that runs from 1:30-4:30 p.m., in Murray Hill Suite A (Second Floor). My paper, titled "Horkheimer's Materialist Stance," is scheduled for 3:30.

Even if you can't make that scintillating event, I hope to see some of you there.
Analytic/Continental Redux
I enjoyed the earlier conversation re: whether there was any meaningful difference between "analytic" and "continental." I was just reading an interesting take on this question: Gary Gutting's review of Brian Leiter's edited collection The Future of Philosophy. There Gutting, against Leiter, wants to maintain the distinction as still meaningful in some way:

"I agree that there is no fruitful analytic-Continental division in terms of substantive doctrines distinctively characteristic of the two sides. But it seems to me that we can still draw a significant distinction between analytic and Continental philosophy in terms of their conceptions of experience and reason as standards of evaluation. Typically, analytic philosophy reads experience in terms of common-sense intuitions (often along with their developments and transformations in science) and understands reason in terms of formal logic. Continental philosophy, by contrast, typically sees experience as penetrating beyond the veneer of common-sense and science, and regards reason as more a matter of intellectual imagination than deductive rigor. In these terms, Continental philosophy still exists as a significant challenge to the increasing hegemony of analytic thought and, as such, deserved a hearing in this volume."
Shaw Defends Successfully
Hi folks:

A quick report that I just attended Mike Shaw's dissertation defense. As you know, I tend to be hypercritical, so please take me quite seriously when I say it was by far the best one I've ever seen (all due respect to all of us). Mike offered a project that was ridiculously well researched, evidenced an encyclopedic knowledge of the Aristotelian corpus (in Greek), and was nothing short of amazing. I know several of us were disappointed by our own experiences with the PhD defense for one reason or another. Mike's conversation with his committee was, at least for me, what I would have hoped for in my best dreams. Mike encountered significant difficulties in his journey to completing the PhD today. He has more than earned the letters behind his name. We can all be quite proud to be associated with him. Well done, Mike!
Plenary Speakers at SPEP @ VU?
I received the CFP poster for SPEP at VU. It doesn't seem to indicate a theme or who the keynote speakers will be. Did I miss that? Anyone know?
big villanova news: donohue new president
just got this news release in my villanova email account:



VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY NAMES PETER M. DONOHUE, O.S.A.
AS 32ND PRESIDENT
Augustinian Named to Succeed Edmund J. Dobbin, O.S.A.





exciting news for me
hi all,

i just wanted to share some exciting news with you, which is that i'm joining the band of villanova alumni to whom philosophy today has been kind -- i just got word from them today that they're going to publish my piece on derrida and kierkegaard, probably sometime in 2006. so that makes quite a lot of us that have gotten something into that journal in the last couple years! the piece is called "questioning the self: kierkegaard and derrida."

hope all is well with everyone, and a belated happy birthday to big JC Berendzen.
Louis Pojman
I just heard about this today. Louis Pojman passed away a couple of months ago. He died of Hepatitis C, contracted years ago through a contaminated blood transfusion. He was the author or editor of 34 books and over 100 articles.

I have taught a number of his essays in my ethics courses. Though I never found myself in agreement with him, he was a formidable figure in the field of ethics. He also had a kind of honesty that I found refreshing, particularly in his work on capital punishment. There again, I could never agree with him but he was very much worth reading and teaching.

There will be a memorial service in NY during the APA: 2pm at the All Souls Unitarian Church in Manhattan on the 30th of December.

Here is his site: http://www.louispojman.com

News and Events at Villanova
I was pottering around on Nova's department page and found two very interesting items on the "news and events" page :

1. Mike Shaw is scheduled to defend his dissertation, "The Role of Desire in Aristotle's Ontology," on Dec. 15. Good luck, and early congratulations, to Mike.

2. I am sure that some of you already knew this, but it took me by surprise--they have scheduled a fifth "Religion and Postmodernism" conference, for Oct. 26-28 2006. This will be roughly two weeks after SPEP, so Nova will be really busy next October. The conference is now sponsored, within the phil. department, by Wetzel's Augustine chair rather than the Cook chair.

Jack Caputo will be back, speaking at the conference. Also, the main speaker is Johann Baptist Metz, which is noteworthy because he is a big deal (I know of his work largely from things Habermas has written about him), but also because (I think--correct me if I am wrong) he is the first headliner of one of these conferences who is not in the first (institutional) instance a philosopher, and he is not French.

The rest of the program includes, among others, Robert Bernasconi, Simon Critchley, (so it will take on a smooth English flavor) and Fred Dallmayr. It also includes Stanley Hauerwas, who I really know nothing about, but I gather he must be some kind of religious studies heavy hitter (my friends at Loyola talk about him all the time).

I mentioned above that I know of Metz from reading things by Habermas, but I should also mention that I know as much or more about him from conversations with Greg (often during our runs back when we both lived in the Fairfax building in west Philthy). Perhaps Greg can fill us in a bit more...