The Joe roadshow, etc.
So, Joe has washed into town, so to speak. We are now trying to find him some money in exchange for a lecture or two - what else could we do?!? He joins the 25 or so undergraduates from various New Orleans universities who have found shelter at Villanova. (For those who are in the know: a P.I.M.P. night for Joe is in the works)
Thank you, Chris and John and Farhang, for your remarks re: my defense. You asked, Chris, about my defense and about my impressions on the process: I am glad to be done, but I too am somewhat ambivalent about the significance of the whole process. For about 4 months over the summer I fretted about fine details of my readings of, for example, Jean-Luc Marion's phenomenology of the called subject and Paul Ricoeur's hermeneutics of the summoned subject . . . and none of this came up either during conversations with my committee or during my defense. I suppose I can assume I "nailed" this material, but I would have appreciated a more detailed response to what I wrote. (Now, I did receive detailed comments from several of the graduate students who volunteered to read individual chapters - and THIS response meant alot to me.)
Now that I am blurring conversation threads . . . finally: Sonja and I visited Farhang and Emily in DC last weekend. We had a good time. The area of "the district" that they live in is quite comfortable, and there are a number of nice places to eat and/or to sit and have a drink. A moment I particularly enjoyed was being greeted by the mad Iranian expatriate who owns a cafe/bar near their place, called the "Marx Cafe" ["revolutionary quisine"], with the words "Welcome Infidels!"
Thank you, Chris and John and Farhang, for your remarks re: my defense. You asked, Chris, about my defense and about my impressions on the process: I am glad to be done, but I too am somewhat ambivalent about the significance of the whole process. For about 4 months over the summer I fretted about fine details of my readings of, for example, Jean-Luc Marion's phenomenology of the called subject and Paul Ricoeur's hermeneutics of the summoned subject . . . and none of this came up either during conversations with my committee or during my defense. I suppose I can assume I "nailed" this material, but I would have appreciated a more detailed response to what I wrote. (Now, I did receive detailed comments from several of the graduate students who volunteered to read individual chapters - and THIS response meant alot to me.)
Now that I am blurring conversation threads . . . finally: Sonja and I visited Farhang and Emily in DC last weekend. We had a good time. The area of "the district" that they live in is quite comfortable, and there are a number of nice places to eat and/or to sit and have a drink. A moment I particularly enjoyed was being greeted by the mad Iranian expatriate who owns a cafe/bar near their place, called the "Marx Cafe" ["revolutionary quisine"], with the words "Welcome Infidels!"
Posted by Gregory Hoskins on
Tuesday September 13, 2005 at 5:04pm
greg, i'd be very interested in looking at your chapters on marion and ricoeur, if you felt comfortable firing them (or just the whole diss.) my way. joe, by the way, can reassure you that sometimes it can be quite handy for someone else to have a copy of your dissertation saved! ;)